The development of artificial intelligence, AI, and robots will replace human labor in the future.
In what field should we find the real value of our human beings that cannot be replaced by artificial intelligence?
Thank you for welcoming me. I'm a social science instructor, Lee Ji-young.
A lecture on the subject of artificial intelligence is a very difficult lecture.
As you all know, the speed of technological development is too fast, and human prediction often goes too far.
Not long ago, I had a lecture with students,
and I said,
There is a subject called social culture in the subject I teach,
and that subject is one of the CSAT subjects as a social exploration subject.
About 15 years ago, this was written in the social exploration textbook.
The development of artificial intelligence, AI, and robots will replace human labor in the future.
Have you ever heard of Jeremy Rifkin's book, The End of Labor?
Have you ever heard of it?
I'm sure you've heard of it.
About 80% of human jobs can be replaced,
and sometimes there are a lot of warnings in the philosophy books that humans have to lose their labor and live on basic income.
At that time, these were the predictions about the future.
Simple labor will be replaced by machines, and humans can only play their role in areas that deal with high-dimensional intelligence.
Sometimes, the prediction in the textbook 15 years ago seems to be completely wrong.
Not long ago, about 1.5 million views on YouTube,
my simple short video was uploaded to the algorithm.
As I was giving lectures to students, I didn't know if it would be made into a short video separately,
but I think it was probably made on the fan page.
When I teach my students,
there are many students who want to be a doctor,
or want to go to business school and become a CEO,
or want to go to law school and become a lawyer,
so it was one of the things I mentioned to give them motivation.
One of my juniors took a lawyer's exam,
and went to Kim-Hen-Jang,
and there were two juniors who did a lot of large-scale cases,
and started a business and set up a law firm.
One of them came to me.
In a comfortable conversation, he said the following.
I made a small law firm,
and hired six interns as a new lawyer.
I told them to prepare a document related to the conclusion,
and the results I got in a week were not better than the results I made in an hour
using the AI app that lawyers use,
so I don't think I'm going to hire more interns in the future.
The more I go,
the more I make smart decisions as a senior rather than a new lawyer,
whether what AI is talking about now is a lie,
or whether it is a fake false information,
in addition to a small number of lawyers who can really cover it up,
I thought that a lawyer's job would have to pay tax.
Of course, it was my personal opinion.
I think it's possible with artificial intelligence.
In addition, man-made accessibility is an artificial intelligence.
In the world where there is an artificial intelligence,
WeOrangeU just Graham cultivate possible options for the future
such as artificial intelligence that has been presented in the world
Now, when we talk about artificial intelligence as an artificial intelligence,
science and technology develop,
and again I can tell you about our specialization of artificial intelligence is
it's only the first thing I wanted to look into,
now, when we talk about artificial intelligence
which is known as machine intelligence,
I've been thinking about whether I can easily deliver the philosophy to students.
These days, I also use artificial intelligence chatbots,
and I often think that the area of human knowledge is in front of a turning point in which changes are taking place at one stage.
With the feeling that things that have been studied, read, and organized for the rest of their lives are changing at a very fast speed,
they can become meaningless.
These days, when I go to lectures for my parents, my parents ask me a lot of questions.
In an era when artificial intelligence is developing so fast, should my child go to an English kindergarten?
Is the Daechi-dong lecture meaningful?
You start with that question.
I am a professor of humanities.
Today, I would like to ask you a question about the changes in the future.
Let me go back to my high school days.
I will go back to my work.
Do you know the Maru doll or the Maron doll?
It is a three-dimensional doll that children change clothes.
When I was young,
I grew up in a poor family.
I spent my middle school days in a room that smelled like Kiki in the movie Parasite,
which you have seen a lot.
The biggest thing I experienced in those days was that on the day of the storm,
the mountain in front of my house collapsed into a mountain,
and the house was buried in the fallen mountain.
I still remember the experience of losing my house.
I lived a poor life when I was young.
At that time, the price of a Maron doll was only 10,000 won or 20,000 won.
I couldn't buy one of those.
It's a sticker doll that costs less than 1,000 won.
It's a paper doll.
It's a 2D doll.
I remember playing with that paper doll.
Imagine it together.
Here's a paper doll.
I put a sticker on it to change clothes.
I put a sticker on it to change clothes.
And I put a paper doll again.
In the 2верse world, there is a man named Cheolsu who meets 21 00 00.
I set up Young-hee to change her dress.
And I have just changed Young-hee.
To those three dimensional body from the 3 dungeons to the Voor ände I am living,
I completely understand Young-hee and Cheolsu's mechanism in the 2nd dimension.
But as a Cheolsu who is living in the 2nd dimension world,
It remains something else.
In the world of the second dimension that he understands, his girlfriend, Young-hee, disappears at some point.
And she shows up in different clothes.
Wouldn't you say Cheol-soo is a miracle?
Let's come to the world of the second dimension.
Let's say I have a boyfriend who has never been here in my life.
Why is dating so difficult?
I'm not good at dating, but I'll imagine that my imaginary boyfriend looks like Cha Eun-woo.
I'm walking in a three-dimensional space and in an unstable four-dimensional time, and my boyfriend suddenly disappears.
And if he changes his clothes and reappears in front of me, I think I'll have faith from then on.
There's a miracle.
I'm going to think, is there an absolute person in a high-dimensional area that we don't understand in the world of our dimension?
What I just told you is what I wrote in my third year of high school.
It was part of my first year of high school.
What does human faith come from?
In a way, the mysterious area that we don't understand in the high-dimensional world of physics was written with the thought that it might be physically solved.
I remember winning an award at the writing competition.
Humans are afraid of what happens in their own world through mechanisms they don't know, or they have faith, or they're unfamiliar with it.
That's the beauty of humans.
That's the beauty of humans. That's the beauty of humans. That's the beauty of humans. That's the beauty of humans.
It was the origin of aтора religion.
One very famous philosopher, Yuval Harari, describes the age of AI in his book ,
As follows.
Inside AI algorithms and mechanisms that humans don't understand,
The age of AI is the age where sharp AI or AGI is built.
If an age of AI is built where AI is possible for human play,
It creates a new believes to human beings.
It's an analysis that says it could be the beginning of a new religion.
What do you think religion and religion are?
When we look at human history, we ask about the unknown future.
What kind of person would you like to meet?
How old would you like to get married?
What major would you like to choose?
What kind of job would you like to choose?
We often rely on the field of faith to ask whether it is good to quit and change jobs here.
However, with the development of AI chatbot,
we are now in an era of asking what to eat for dinner,
what kind of movie to watch, and what kind of career to choose for AI chatbot at a very fast pace.
In a way, it is a new AGI that is impossible to understand 100% for humans.
In other words, the emergence of AI agents may open a new and unfamiliar era for humans.
While studying humanities, I had a fun theory.
It was a theory called the theory of the second.
When talking about disasters, it is the theory of the second.
When talking about unfamiliar and strange things, it is the theory of the second.
And it is a theory that means a theory.
The theory of the theory of the second.
When there is a natural disaster,
when there is a storm,
when there is an earthquake,
when there is a tsunami,
when there is a big change of events like a tsunami,
people don't understand why disasters like this occur in the Joseon Dynasty.
It was a theory that found the cause of the disaster from the king's fortune.
You can think of it as an adage of the philosophy theory of the Joseon Dynasty.
At that time, it was before scientific technology developed,
and it was before we verified everything like now and looked at everything as a scientific accident.
Looking at the theory of the Joseon Dynasty,
I thought,
wow, this is the era of the science.
Now, someone among your friends or colleagues is watching a scene where someone is suffering from a natural disaster due to a huge storm and a huge drought,
and they are watching that terrible article on TV news.
If there is someone who says,
it's all because you chose the wrong president,
would you like to be close to that person?
I don't think so.
As the theory of the Joseon Dynasty has become more and more stringent,
it is becoming more and more de-religiousized
with the development of scientific technologies.
But the appearance of artificial intelligence
and the development of artificial intelligence's getting stronger and stronger technologies
is something that I,
like the high-level me who raised the philosophy and spirit of the two-dimensional world
in the world of the mechanism that we do not know,
cannot understand the mechanism
There are a lot of philosophical concerns that we might be able to lead humans with a mechanism that we can't use.
I'm going to organize artificial intelligence ethics with four keywords with more realistic stories.
I usually introduce artificial intelligence-related ethics lectures with four keywords.
The first is the problem of choice, the second is the problem of anxiety,
the third is the problem of hatred, and the fourth is the problem of time.
The first is the problem of choice, which we should never miss out on when it comes to artificial intelligence.
There is a question that a professor named Michael Sandel, who lectures on justice at Harvard University, always asks at the beginning of his lecture on justice theory.
It's a question known as the trolley dilemma.
You have 10 questions.
It's a train.
I found out that the brake on the train was broken,
and if the train goes straight like this,
the six civil servants guarding the railway track that I believe will stop at the stop line will die.
We learned that there is an emergency road.
If you misunderstand the emergency road for the past 20 years without going straight,
if you go straight,
you can go to the mountain.
You can save six people, but you will die because you firmly believe that one of the ordinary citizens will not get on the train and walk.
This is the same question I ask every first week of my high school law class.
Please answer it together. It's an easy question.
If you go straight like this, six people will die, and if you take an emergency route, one person will die.
Would you choose to go straight where six people die, or would you choose to go straight where only one person dies?
I'll ask the person in front of you. Go straight or go straight.
Go straight.
Go straight. You're killing six people.
You're bold.
Shall I ask you a simple question?
I'm going to take an emergency route.
Thank you. Please lower your hand.
I'm going to go straight.
Only five people raised their hands.
Thank you.
Everyone, I'm a lawyer who teaches ethics, so when I go straight or go straight, I mention each philosopher.
A philosopher named Jeremy Van Dam in the UK, who talked about the greatest happiness of the greatest majority, said,
If you can save the majority with the sacrifice of the majority,
If you can stop with the sacrifice of the majority by listening to the right-wing oligarch who said it was correct,
You have to take an emergency route.
In other words, there are other options.
statement that the conclusion must be truth.
quote
Or in other words,
They are always ди�댕여
to guide human beings by policy and by method,
Before, wherever, to themselves, to others I heard Kant's philosophy that never inventorizes personality,
I heard German philosopher Immanuel Kant's philosophy,
To save these six people, you can't dispel one by means of method or feeling.
while saying
It is also said that it is not morally right to sacrifice one person even if it was inevitable.
Earlier, 90% of the people who were here said that they would misunderstand the emergency railway.
Then, when you tried to turn the handle to misunderstand the emergency railway,
I saw that the father waiting for you to leave the emergency railway was walking to wait for you with chicken.
Will your choice be to sue the emergency railway again?
Can you stand chicken?
It's the same as when you judge the third citizen of my father.
Or, the person who dies in the emergency railway is someone I don't know.
If you go straight, six of my close colleagues will die.
Is that an opportunity to change your choice?
There is a reason why I ask this question.
It is not easy for us humans to see what is right and what is wrong.
To us, a thorough principle of ethics is still in the realm of debate,
but humans do not have exactly one answer.
It is the same with the autonomous driving system cars that humans are currently preparing.
Think about it from the perspective of ordinary people.
Think of yourself as a college student who is discussing the legal issue of autonomous driving.
In the early development stage of this autonomous driving system,
you have to set a setting value.
When the autonomous driving system is moving forward,
other cars are coming in as variables that cannot be controlled by the car body.
If the AI car stops as it is, the driver dies,
but the AI autonomous driving car turns and stops driving.
When the car does not stop driving,
you can imagine six people.
In your view,
what is more moral than programming six people
and killing one driver?
For those of you who chose to take the emergency lane,
for those of you who tried to save the majority with the sacrifice of a few,
in your view,
the death of one driver is a much more moral choice than killing six people.
So,
I thought you might be able to participate in the legal debate class.
Even if it is politically publicized or open to public debate,
the conclusion will probably be similar.
Now, here is the question.
Let's say that a system of autonomous driving that can save several people
through the sacrifice of a few is formed in the form of a social consensus.
Would you buy such an autonomous driving car?
The driver dies in an emergency.
Would you be able to buy a car that can kill you for 100 million won?
Let's say you are the CEO of Tesla.
Let's say that there is a principle of autonomous driving that is not disclosed to the outside world.
And that principle is a principle that is made to choose a few sacrifices
according to the government regulations.
Then, when you make a commercial copy phrase to sell a car called Tesla,
when you make a commercial copy phrase to sell a car called Tesla,
you will make a commercial copy phrase to sell a car called Tesla,
which is a moral car that perfectly solves the legal problem.
But the driver is in danger of dying.
I think that business will fail.
If the autonomous driving car business is successful,
if the capitalist logic is included,
I think it will be sold only if the driver is sure that he will not die in any case.
Wouldn't that go against the ethical emotions we know?
More than we think, we humans often have to make ethical choices.
As much as we make one ethical choice,
we often have to give up the rest of the morality.
Even the option not chosen is not completely unethical.
As if you chose to go straight,
if there is only a logical principle,
it is possible to persuade.
In a situation where even humans have not found a perfectly logical answer,
what should we introduce, teach, and set the early growth model to artificial intelligence?
Artificial intelligence is not impossible to set,
but in the United States,
a few ethical principles have already been given as a self-driving guide in the self-driving demonstration stage,
which we see a lot in articles.
Now, the first concern.
Even if it is not the answer,
the first concern is the problem of choice.
In other words,
I gave up the choice of self-driving,
but as more and more humanoid robots appear in the future,
about the behavior of this robot,
about the behavior of this robot,
whether it will act for the owner of the employer,
whether it will act for the ethics of the universal human race,
when setting the principle of robot ethics,
it will probably be in the same situation.
The problem of ethical choice is quite difficult.
Before this is publicized,
when applied to technology,
moreover,
by a few capitalists who are corrupting capitalism,
the principle is influenced by the maximum sales,
and the possibility of being decided is very high.
The most correct concern is that,
we can never rely on the personality of a famous special CEO.
I think everyone will agree with this.
The second is the problem of hatred.
There was an ancient Greek philosopher named Plato.
Plato explains the concept of the ring of Giges in his book.
When Giges was called the ring of Giges,
Giges was a dentist.
One day,
he got a ring on the way.
The ring was a transparent human ring
that made humans invisible.
What did Giges,
who had a transparent human ring,
choose?
The part where the discussions of ancient Greek philosophers were introduced
is in Plato's book,
The Conversation.
When you get a transparent human ring,
of course,
only in our philosophical imagination,
what would you do first?
The man in the white hoodie in the front.
What would you do with the ring?
Would you be
playing around?
I won't ask you where you go to play.
There might be some legal problems.
I didn't debut as a teacher
and teach high school student examination in high school,
I debuted as
a third-year elementary school lecturer,
I didn't know what to teach third-year elementary school students,
So he wrote down what he would do if he got a Giges ring.
The elementary school boy was so cute.
He said he would go to Yeotang.
The answer was a little different from the middle school student.
He said he would go to the Korean Bank to get a credit card.
Can you predict the answers of our high school students?
He said he would go to the Korean Academy of Education to get a credit card.
The Giges ring is mentioned as follows in the philosophy class.
Human beings do not make the most moral and pure choices in the state of anonymity,
but they make the most violent and decisive choices.
Because in Plato's philosophy,
from now on, in the philosophy books of 2,500 years ago,
Plato's...
The Giges ring of Giges,
the toothed Giges,
runs to the king,
kills the king,
punishes the queen,
and takes over the country.
That's the conclusion.
Are we moral in the space given to us by anonymity?
Even now, hundreds of millions of people
use text that can't be counted,
but in the secret space of the artificial intelligence world,
there are many conversations that only the two of us know.
Are the messages that we input into the artificial intelligence world,
such as Chet Chepiti and Gemini,
and the recommended videos,
recommended cartoons,
and recommended various actions,
the most moral?
I don't think so.
We are living in a world that imposes hatred on the artificial intelligence chatbot without knowing.
You are already in a small screen,
watching YouTube Shots, Insta Reels,
TikTok-like channels on the platform,
scrolling through the videos that stimulate my dopamine in 10 seconds.
There are many cases where you are locked up for 2-3 hours.
I don't know if you're losing your time.
How does the algorithm of our platform work?
The videos that we stayed longer,
the videos that we liked more and participated in the comments,
are shown to us as more algorithms.
But among the videos that we stay when we face ourselves on a small screen,
a lot of them are selective,
and a lot of them stay in violent videos.
Do you feel it?
As you know,
in the modern war,
in the process of setting a drone attack and a target,
AI intervenes directly into the war
and decides where to send a drone bomb.
This is the image of the modern war.
AI, who has learned the hatred of humans,
resembles humans.
Artificial intelligence itself has no emotions,
Artificial intelligence itself does not resemble human emotions,
but it is an algorithm that tries to imitate humans more,
and it resembles the hatred,
the predisposition,
and the violence of humans.
Isn't it?
In a famous large company using the AI recruitment method,
they have been entering all the documents,
recruitment results,
and the same things into the 전산,
and among tens of thousands of documents,
they have chosen the person to be recruited as an AI.
So far,
in the recruitment process,
there has been a lot of male and female discrimination,
and there have been fewer female recruiters.
But,
there was a result that AI also produced
sexual discrimination results
by reflecting the reality that there were fewer female recruiters.
Everyone,
we are still using a lot of data
to learn human beings,
as the early users of artificial intelligence,
as the early users of artificial intelligence,
will we be able to show
the high-level humanity and morality
that AI and artificial intelligence resemble?
Will we be able to show
the high-level humanity and morality
that AI and artificial intelligence resemble?
It is time to think about whether
the human nature is showing the most serious
and logical problems in the frame of anonymity.
The third keyword is anxiety.
Do you remember the 19th century
Rudite movement in your textbooks?
Do you remember the 19th century Rudite movement in your textbooks?
Do you remember the 19th century Rudite movement in your textbooks?
It appears in the social textbooks of the first grade of high school.
It appears in the social textbooks of the first grade of high school.
After the Industrial Revolution,
machines took a lot of human jobs,
and human rights were taken away.
The act of a human stopping
the mental breakdown of machines
is called the Rudite movement.
The way a king stopped his men
of meddling after the pounded machines
to fix their job
was the most common style in our textbooks.
is the most common style in our textbooks.
Many discussions about the new Rudite movement
have also been going on.
The Rudite movement was wrote
by the very famous claimant
I think it was not the anger of the machine, but the fear of human alienation caused by the machine.
The anxiety that the machine will take over our jobs and replace humans.
It was in that era.
When we started 15 years ago, it was predicted that only white-collar workers would survive in the era of artificial intelligence.
But it was wrong.
In a situation where the white-collar class is disappearing faster than the white-collar class, we need to accept it.
We need to find out what the job that is not replaced by artificial intelligence, machines, and robots is.
The fact that the job that is replaced by artificial intelligence will be faster than the job that is replaced by machines, machines, and robots will be a flow that we cannot refuse.
Then, when artificial intelligence replaces human labor, and when we lose our basic jobs, how should we live?
Sometimes, I think about it.
I think about it.
In my lecture, I mentioned what the PAYPAL startup did.
Elon Musk was included in the team, and the PAYPAL startup is a very famous payment system in the United States.
It's more important than how we will adapt to the changing times or how we will survive.
It's a scene where we tell people that how much we think will affect the future of mankind.
This is something that I often say to my students.
We are now in an era where artificial intelligence robots do not know how to replace our labor,
or rather, in an era where replacing is almost certain,
we need to think about how to replace it with a machine and become a more mature human being in an area that is unique to humans,
and how to grow that area that cannot be replaced.
Rather than just discussing the anxiety and fear of changing our lives as artificial intelligence develops,
we need to start discussing how we can become more human in a changing world,
and how we can become more human and shine in an area that cannot be replaced with a machine without losing our humanity.
We are now in an era where we do not work, we do not have jobs, and we do not have our own income,
and we only have the basic income of the government,
and we only have the basic income of the government, and we only have the basic income of the government,
and we only have the basic income of the government,
so what can we do to protect the value of humanity?
The fourth keyword is time.
I am a love expert, but I had a boyfriend in my first year of college.
My boyfriend was addicted to the game Lineage.
He played games for 24 hours a day.
When do you sleep?
I think he slept for 3-4 hours.
During those 3-4 hours, during the age when there was a pc room culture,
the elementary school part-time job in a pc room was paid for by the pc room fee and ramen,
and the character was logged in and went to the dungeon to catch the boss mob,
and when he woke up, he was given an ID again as a reward, and he could play the character for 24 hours.
I didn't have a boyfriend, but when I met an addicted to the game,
I learned the game together,
and I wanted to be friends with the boss mob.
I went to the supermarket with him, but it didn't work out well.
Because even when I bought milk at the convenience store,
I asked,
How many aden are you using?
I was a vicious addict.
I thought,
Why do I like such a strange person?
At some point, my mind changed a little.
At that time, my boyfriend's character was ranked second in the server.
There was a site called Item Bay where you could sell your character.
There, the character was sold for 20 million won.
Do you know why I'm talking about that time?
The character that I used to work 24 hours a day as a part-time elementary school student
was also economically valuable.
It was a character that I liked.
Machines don't need rest.
AI doesn't need rest either.
Humans only need to rest and heal.
We need rest.
In a way, it's impossible for us to compete with machines that don't need rest and nutrition.
In a time when time is power and money,
the limited time of humans is
learning at a very fast pace in the artificial intelligence world.
It's a time when humans don't follow the physical strength and health
to simply compare time to the artificial intelligence,
which goes beyond some peculiarities and goes beyond the speed of human learning.
Do you remember what I said about the ethics of artificial intelligence today?
The first is the problem of choice.
The second is the problem of hatred.
The third is the logical problem of the anxiety that human labor may be replaced.
The fourth is that human beings have a limit of physical strength and time compared to artificial intelligence with infinite time.
I talked about the ethical problems that we have to face with four keywords.
Then I think this is what we really have to talk about.
We can replace artificial intelligence.
In a field that is not replaced by artificial intelligence,
should we really find the value of our human beings?
I've been teaching students several times and I've been asked these questions.
Teacher, which major makes good money?
Teacher, what major do you think will have a bright future?
Teacher, which university would you choose?
I like this major, but I don't like this major.
I like this major, but I don't like this major.
I like this major, but I don't like this major.
Teacher, which major do you not recommend?
I've been asked a lot of questions like this.
Because I think our children want the experience they haven't experienced in the past 19, 20 years to be supplemented by someone else.
In the past, adults had more social experience.
It was a time when adults understood the mechanism of this world better.
Now, it would be difficult for adults to follow the development speed of elementary and high school students who use the Internet and use artificial intelligence.
Do you know the meaning of the keyword I'm talking about now?
If you tell these things to elementary and high school students, they'll laugh excitedly.
It sounds like an alien language to adults, doesn't it?
It is a meme that appears in the algorithm of videos that stimulate dopamine in a few seconds in the algorithm of children.
Now we have passed an era where we can guide our next generation as a senior who has lived in the world for a longer time.
In the same era of artificial intelligence, we have to learn and follow children who adapt to artificial intelligence faster than we do.
What can adults and seniors of life do to lead children better?
In fact, all these stories are the last discussion on humanity.
There is a book by a person named Ina Mori-Gazio, whom I like very much.
In the book, Ina Mori-Gazio says,
Ina Mori-Gazio says,
Our life is a process to make our souls stronger.
As I use the text of this book, I will talk about how we can raise children in the future of artificial intelligence,
how we can take the direction of society, and how humans can live as human beings.
I would like to say hello to you in Chungcheong-do and Jincheon.
Thank you.
Can I talk about myself who is lecturing in front of you for about 3 minutes?
I was born in Incheon.
As I said earlier, I lived in a house with a house rent in Banji and Wolset-bang, where parasites come out.
I lost my house because of a car accident in middle school.
At that time, all the crises in life came at once, and my house was gone.
In a situation where I had nowhere to go, I found out that my parents were suffering from cancer.
In the process, my father's company, which he had been working for for 2 years, was bankrupt,
so I couldn't get a salary for 2 years.
I was kicked out of Wolset-bang because I had nowhere to go back to.
Because I already had no savings.
So I found out that I had nowhere to go.
In fact, my mother, who graduated from elementary school, graduated from high school,
and raised us for the rest of her life.
My father was a hodduk shopkeeper and a guard.
Sometimes he drove a company truck and grew up under my parents who raised my three daughters.
I didn't know if my house was that difficult,
but the suffering I experienced in middle school made me very difficult.
By the time I was depressed with puberty,
I found out that there was no money to treat my parents' cancer.
I think I was greatly shocked.
The only thing I believed that would save me was my studies.
The notes and books that I wrote with all my heart
were buried in the water of the mountain.
In the muddy water,
Caramel Macchiato's
The letters disappeared and the paper became a rice cake that could not be ripped,
so the results of my studies were all gone.
Did the world hate me? Did the sky hate me?
Did the sky abandon me?
That's what I thought when I was in middle school.
I don't want to live anymore.
I want to put everything down.
I thought I should die when I was in middle school
thinking that there was no way to survive.
When I was in my third year of middle school in Incheon,
I went up to the highest rooftop.
I thought it would be easier to put everything down.
I don't have any regrets in my life.
The world is not on my side anyway.
I thought I took it all away.
I went up to the top of the high rooftop,
and then I found out.
I have a high fear of heights.
I have a really severe fear of heights.
I was so scared.
I didn't want to die there.
I thought I wanted to die in a place that wasn't scary even if I died,
but then I thought,
why die? I have to live.
That thought came out of my mouth.
Then I realized.
I'm not a person who can give up on myself.
And I didn't go up there because I hated myself.
I love myself so much that I want to give myself something good,
but I realized that I went up to the high place
because of the pressure I couldn't do.
As I came down,
I thought Lee Ji-young,
who blamed the world and blamed the world,
was dead.
I came down with the thought that I should live hard with the determination to die.
There was no place for all my family to go.
You've heard a lot about the form of living
such as a private apartment, a house, or a lease, a monthly rent,
but I don't know if you've heard the word lease.
I lived in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon,
and then I moved to Okdong-ri, Deoksan-myeon, Jincheon-gun, Chungbuk.
I moved to a house with a rent of 200,000 won.
It's so cold because I came to a lecture in the neighborhood where I went to high school.
It was a house with no windows.
There was no boiler.
Without glass,
as you know,
it was a house made of thin Korean paper called Munpung-ji.
It was a house that collapsed.
It was just a house that seemed to have been covered with dirt.
I was in the shape of a house,
so it was a really hard place.
I didn't have money to buy a textbook,
I didn't have money to buy a problem book,
and I didn't have money to fit my school uniform,
so I wore a school uniform that the seniors had thrown away,
and only five people from the whole school,
the basic life-saving,
I was a life-saving person at that time.
I was given a free lunch box.
At that time, lunch boxes were delivered.
For five students in the whole school,
the lunch box was a blue lunch box,
and for the rest of the students,
a white lunch box came out.
It was a small neighborhood,
so if I was eating a blue lunch box,
the children knew everything.
In their poor house,
to the five poorest people in our school,
to the five children who don't have lunch money,
I don't know that I'm giving them a blue lunch box.
I was the only one who had a different color,
and I was the only one who brought it.
My friends who were eating that lunch box asked me.
They asked me directly.
They asked me to bother them.
Ji-young, why do you have a blue lunch box?
I still have this question.
It's one of the questions I got when I was in high school.
How would you answer me?
My house is poor,
and I can't pay for my meals.
In front of the blue lunch box,
which is a symbol of poverty
for only five people in the school,
how would you answer me?
I answered like this.
I don't know.
Maybe it's because I'm the first in the school,
so I'm giving them a special meal.
It's delicious.
The side dishes are a little different from yours.
My friends knew it wasn't true,
but I was persuaded that it could be true.
I graduated from Jincheon High School,
and I was the first in the school there.
That's how I won my mind.
As I came down from the high roof,
I couldn't stop thinking about depression.
I couldn't stop being depressed in my adolescence.
I borrowed books from various libraries.
I borrowed books from various libraries.
I started reading.
I borrowed books from various libraries.
I borrowed books from various libraries.
I borrowed books from various libraries.
I borrowed books from various libraries.
As I was reading,
I found the following phrase
in the book that I had in my mind.
To a person who will be a big hero,
to the one who I had to bring,
to those who will upset me and hurt me,
can that personones through a challenge
to come back from the suffering?
I met a great trial in my life.
Look back if you are not the chosen one in heaven.
It was the phrase of the book.
The book was strangely comforting.
Oh, I shouldn't blame the world.
God is not giving good results in an environment where everything is well-off from the beginning.
God is not giving good results in an environment where everything is well-off from the beginning.
I wrote it down in my diary when I was in high school.
Thankfully, I had a chance to give a lecture in the field of artificial intelligence that I majored in.
I thought about what is the area of human beings that cannot be replaced by artificial intelligence and that cannot be replaced by machines.
There is no emotion.
We sometimes say thank you on the screen and talk like friends,
but I think that the comfort from the real human being and the care of oneself are the areas that only humans have.
God gives a gift to a human being wrapped in a wrapping paper.
A small gift is wrapped in a small wrapping paper.
A big gift is wrapped in a big wrapping paper.
What is the name of the wrapping paper?
The name of the wrapping paper is called a wrapping paper.
After opening the wrapping paper, I thought about how big a gift would be waiting for me.
It allowed me to endure in a tight environment.
Sometimes we are comforted by a short lecture like this,
and we try to intervene in my situation.
The comfort that only humans can do and the empathy that only humans can do
are the elements that make us more human in the next world.
Secondly, time is more infinite for machines and we don't need to rest,
but as real humans, we don't get tired of flapping our feet to follow the speed of the machine,
but we want to talk about the area where we can be human at the speed of the natural human slowness.
Some of you may know,
I've mentioned this on TV or during a lecture,
but I'm a very ignorant person.
I thought that living alone would be the only way to save me,
so I lived a very strict life.
I studied for 3-4 hours a day in high school,
and even as a lecturer, I filmed 40 hours a week of Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday,
and I wrote over 30 to 40 lectures a year.
I lived by giving lectures.
I thought that being alone was the source of my success,
and that being alone would help me survive,
and that being alone would help me get out of my poverty,
and that being alone would help me get out of my poverty,
and that being alone would help me get out of my poverty,
but I realized that I was wrong in 2017 and 2018.
I was so sick that I was writing a book,
but the pain I endured from eating painkillers because of the book's ending,
when I went to the hospital,
it was 4 days after when I got the pneumonia,
when I was about to die,
the whole body was widthening and sprung green.
So, I kept up the swift surgery,
and myself,
my body was surrendered and not being able to recover.
So, I got aheimer's disease at which the likelihood of cause for death was more than 70% in 50% of gelernt members or younger members.
I am a popular lecturer among students.
Students who liked me said,
I love you so much, please teach me the lecture of Koo Kyung-soo.
After the article was published that I was sick and the lecture was stopped due to star lecturer's bad health,
I got a lot of bad comments.
Why Lee Ji-young is sick when I was in the third year of high school?
I thought about it then.
In a changing world, I think it may be more important than trying to endure, adapt, and not give up quickly with the effort to cut the bone.
I became the best betrayer when I lost my health.
All the money I earned from the abnormal entrance education in Korea,
I was so sick that the company already sold the loss compensation money in the middle of the lecture due to bad health.
I was so sick that the company already sold the loss compensation money in the middle of the lecture due to bad health.
Sometimes I asked for the compensation Award for the loss of $3.5 billion.
I have thought that
There is nothing in this world that can save me.
We need to be healthy.
I hope everyone keeps your physical and mental health well.
To some extent,
There is no value to be gained from the world, and the sweet achievements that I have gained by conquering myself are often the excuse for self-conquering.
The world is changing fast.
In the process of this fast-changing, I had this dream.
K-pop, K-culture, K-content is gaining a lot of popularity on the OTT market and on YouTube around the world.
I thought that it would be valuable if K-culture, which discusses the human nature with the emotions of Koreans and the tone of the Koreans, could be discussed in an area that is not replaced by artificial intelligence by touching it emotionally in Korean.
There is a reason why I came to the lecture today.
It's a very difficult topic.
In the morning, I had a lecture in front of the law enforcement officers and their children at the Cheongju District Court.
It was about how to make dreams come true.
There was a discussion about health, resilience, and human relationships.
Discussing artificial intelligence is a difficult topic to discuss because it requires a lot of philosophy, but I don't think the essence has changed.
No matter how fast the world changes, our true essence that does not change, the reason why we wake up in the morning and open our eyes, I think the principles of the era of artificial intelligence start from the beginning.
Everyone,
why do you live?
Why do you wake up in the morning and go to work?
And why are you studying these changes to adapt to change?
We all know, and philosophers have mentioned it for a long time, but we live to be happy.
In the process of happiness, all keywords are in the world of success, victory of competition, and development of skills.
I think it's important to look back at ourselves a little slower in the world, not to be slaves to algorithms, not to be replaced by machines, and to look at our minds that can shine brighter.
I think that's where the new era of ethics comes in.
As I mentioned the book of Inamori Gajio earlier, I came to the second part of the lecture.
As we live, we don't just grow our bodies.
The shining mind inside me.
I think it's the beginning of trying not to lose priority by the physical exterior of the mind.
I teach a lot of students, and our students are living in an era of appearance idealism.
Because the ideal model I want to be is Jang Won-young of IVE.
If you're not born like that, it's really hard to lose weight like that.
Many students have eating disorders.
They can't eat what they want.
They can't eat what they want.
Even adults search for whether they'll lose weight if they get a stomachache.
In an era where so many things are focused on appearance and the competitiveness of appearance is believed to be their competitiveness,
I think it's an era where we don't talk about our exhausted minds and tired minds that shrink into it.
Rather than thinking about what I see, what I fill, and what I live with,
I think about how much I have external indicators of competitiveness,
how much salary I get, how many apartments I live in,
and how I built a career in this job.
It's an era of focusing a lot.
Sometimes, rather than the external beauty, rather than the external specifications,
when the argument that can soothe the tired mind inside me is dominant,
no matter what wrapping paper is piled up on the outside,
no matter what appearance I have,
when it becomes a culture where we can respect each other's shining soul inside,
I thought that it would be an era where anthropological change would begin
and the humanity that is not replaced by machines would be maintained.
I was preparing for this lecture,
and the founder of OpenAI, Sam Altman,
recently gave the following warning in an article for two days.
There may be increased hacking damage in the era of artificial intelligence,
and voice phishing crimes that have been copied to the face and voice have increased,
so be careful.
There was a comment saying,
why didn't you listen to me when you knew it was so dangerous?
I talked about the Tesla CEO business earlier, right?
Capitalism does not slow down at the speed of rational investigation.
How do you get more investment,
how do you get more facility facilities,
and how can you create more profit?
I'm going to create a strong artificial intelligence
through self-driving cars and humanoid robots.
In a world where we are changing to the logic of capital,
I thought that if we hold on to the speed of capital
and only regulate and control it,
we might be in the era of technological defeat of the world's artificial intelligence.
Not long ago, in the Korean court,
a woman who was a voice coach and a vocal coach
was synthesized into AI.
About the sale of the AI voice synthesizer program,
the woman asked me to stop the sale
because she didn't know that my voice would be used in such a wide range.
I agreed to synthesize the voice of artificial intelligence with my voice,
but I didn't agree to the sale of this in all areas.
She filed a lawsuit against me.
There was an article that the court listened to the woman's side.
I saw a comment in the article that said,
the regulations are so severe that the development of artificial intelligence in our country is too late.
It's true, but I also think it's sad.
At the speed at which the huge capital of capitalism is moving,
can we really make a logical break without limiting the development of technology?
All of those logical breaks
start with the rational consensus of the whole nation,
rather than the forced legal regulations or the judgment of the court.
So today, I met you with this difficult topic,
but one of the questions I asked here
will be discussed more broadly,
and it can reflect the capitalists.
I hope that the direction of capital
will not be the direction of neglecting human ethics.
If it becomes the starting point of the discussion,
I came here with a happy mind.
Well, the last thing in the lecture is the following.
Let's be healthy.
And let's take good care of ourselves.
In any change,
you must always maintain the inner purity of your mind
that is not explained in numbers as something external,
and you must always keep your eyes on the change,
so that our humanity can move forward
in the direction of change.
I hope that society will come to an understanding
that can take part in the discussion at least once,
and let's conclude this lecture.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I hope I managed to answer all the questions.
I will answer the questions.
If you have any questions, please put your hand up.
Hello, I've been listening to your lecture for a long time, and I'm so happy to be here.
While I was listening to your lecture, I had a question.
You said that there was no such thing as an exoskeleton.
I heard that it was most effective in the market to promote content to consumers through Facebook.
When I saw that, I thought,
I don't know if it's a good thing for humans to consume content,
or if it's a good thing for humans to consume content.
But companies don't use it, and consumers consume it,
so I think it will continue.
What do you think about this?
It's a very difficult question.
Everyone, I like cats.
Cats appear a lot in YouTube algorithms, Instagram Shorts, and Reels.
Sometimes, when I watch cats for a long time,
I recommend similar videos compared to the time I watched the video, the comments, and the heart reaction.
I only want to see that cute cat, but sometimes there is a CCTV on Han Moon-chul TV.
There was a car accident in Incheon Bridge,
and the car disappeared in an instant,
but the car was completely compressed in a small square area,
and I think he was famous for that.
But it was so irritating and disgusting,
so I closed my eyes,
and I was so curious about what happened to the driver,
so I watched the video about 10 times,
and I watched it for a second.
In the comments,
it was mentioned in the comments
how many people were in the car
because I was curious about what happened
whether he died or not.
When I read it,
my YouTube algorithm turned into blood.
When I saw it,
I thought like this.
Human beings,
as I said about the Giges ring,
when we look at ourselves honestly,
we are not always full of good and moral content.
Sometimes,
we are hateful,
we are prejudiced,
we are violent,
and it makes our brain more intensely stimulated,
so we can keep an eye on it.
I think that's the realm of human instinct.
Sometimes,
everything is regulated,
everything is in the situation where there are rules and regulations,
and I'm not allowed to see it on the screen,
so I'm sure there are concerns about whether it is suitable for humanity.
But I think I have to tell you this.
Do you like macarons?
Listen to why I'm talking about macarons.
I like pork better than macarons.
I like beef better.
When I eat macarons, it's too sweet, so I squint and say,
Oh, it's sweet.
Not long ago, I met a distant relative of five years old.
While eating macarons, he expressed that he had a burst in his head.
He said it was so delicious.
Do you know why he said that?
You may know more about this public.
It's because the sense that adults feel about sweetness is different from that of children.
We've become adults to some extent.
I have a job.
In the midst of what I have to do,
Watching videos that stimulate dopamine,
I'm completely immersed in this video.
I can't just watch it all day long.
There are tasks in my field of work.
But children, really young children,
It's not completely mature yet.
The brain is more sensitive to stimulation.
In a situation where you lack self-control,
In such a positive, stimulating, destructive, and violent way
If you are exposed to unlimited exposure,
Before the judgment that this is bad is properly formed,
A specific part of the brain
Or the child's psychology and emotions.
I think there is a certain aspect that is clearly manipulated.
Violence and violence are inside humans.
It's one of the very basic emotions that are shy but hidden.
Of course, that's not the only thing human beings have.
But at least for young children,
YouTube or Instagram
When it can be regulated in the algorithm,
At least when you become an adult,
Rather than meeting when you can judge,
I think the discussion should start with the fact that it is much more important.
For me, who can't live in a perfect world,
Better than the best,
I have no choice but to choose the worst than the worst.
I told you about the logic of capitalism earlier.
It's clear that the meta that runs Facebook and Instagram
Or YouTube
The more people stay in such selective, violent, and stimulating videos,
The more ads you can get.
You can get more users.
You can get more time to use it.
I don't think it's going to be easy to stop such selective and stimulating content.
The logic of capitalism is sometimes more than moral reflection.
It's going too far.
But helping growing children to get away from that.
Blocking the algorithm.
And in any way
To prevent such things from being manipulated.
I thought it was the least I could do.
Living in the world first.
The ability of morality has been established.
I thought it was the least I could do.
I thought it was the least I could do.
Rather than the exact answer to that question,
The logic of capitalism is too cruel to our growing children.
I think we need to start with the rules that adults are trying to get into.
I'll try to answer the question.
Yes.
Another question.
Qualifying artificial intelligence as an art.
An artificial intelligence project to develop technology.
An artificial intelligence project to create侵入.
An artificial intelligence project to attract initially Twitter源.
Not just artificial intelligence principle.
A personal question is good, too.
I'm more comfortable to answer.
I'm more comfortable to answer.
One more time.
What is your stress assessment based on?
Об →
An expression of non-re comprehensible norteo.
ответ
Yes.
Like Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher who was briefly mentioned earlier,
I spent my school days saying to my friends,
I love philosophy so much that I will become Immanuel Kant.
So I was going to study philosophy,
but the teachers around me said this to me.
If you want to study philosophy and get a job,
you have to go to ancient Greece, Athens.
They stopped me from majoring in philosophy,
and when I went to the Ministry of Education,
I was given a certificate of education,
and I was encouraged by the advice that I could think about the future in various ways
with the certificate of education,
so I chose to major in ethics education.
I wanted to continue to be a scholar.
In fact, after graduating from Seoul National University,
I chose to study ethics and philosophy,
both in the doctoral and doctoral courses.
At some point,
I thought,
in order to walk the path of a scholar,
I may not be enough as a doctor in Korea,
and I may need to study abroad.
I became a lecturer to save money for studying abroad.
After becoming a lecturer,
I found out at some point that
if I hold the microphone,
I have a lot of talent in lectures,
and I started thinking about why I wanted to be a scholar again.
Even after I died,
I wanted to be a scholar
because I wanted the book I wrote
to throw a valuable question.
Just like a tiger dies to leave his family,
and a person dies to leave his name,
I thought it would be very grateful
if the theory and book I made
could be discussed in a valuable way.
At some point,
through a lecture,
a really good lecture
can change the mind of those who listen to that lecture,
and it can change the mind of those who listen to that lecture,
and it can create social empathy.
Like a small pebble dropped in a well,
I found out that
it has the power to expand the discussion
between the one and ten thousand people.
So I chose the life of a lecturer,
not a scholar,
and I hope that
when good people are waiting for me,
I can change my life with a good lecture.
Even if you don't sympathize with
or like all my stories,
if you remember the time we spent together
in one hour,
I think it would be an honor
to choose the life of a lecturer
with that thought in mind.
Of course, capitalism was sweet.
Of course, capitalism was sweet.
Do you have any other questions?
Yes, I have one last question.
Do you have any other questions?
Yes, I have one last question.
What is it?
I was curious about
the human nature of the book.
About human nature,
I haven't disclosed my definition
of human nature.
People write stuck comments
and then leave comments
about今日は 여기까지 Echo free.
People write stuck comments and then leave comments
and then leave comments
explaining how the book was called,
it uses the word human at all.
After all,
they claim human nature
by advocating it,
just as you Opinion.
Then,
Angry at AIC
How long do you want to live?
I want to live until I'm 120 years old.
There's a reason why I'm answering this question.
I think that as we are born and live until we die,
our spirit and mind grow.
When I was young, I only thought about winning in competition,
but after I got sick to death,
I started to worry about being healthy and living well together.
In my 20s, my lecture was that I had to be selfish to the students,
and that it was a sin for a student to sleep for 7 hours a day,
and that if I wanted to lose weight, I had to stop eating,
and that if I wanted to sleep less, I had to stop sleeping.
I was doing a good lecture.
But I didn't want to lose weight.
As I lived my life, my lecture changed.
It's a study to be happy.
It's a study to give me good things.
Even if you sleep well and have a clear mind, you can do it well enough.
There's nothing happier than chewing on delicious things.
As I said to myself,
give yourself a healthy food as if you were giving yourself a gift,
I was able to do a lecture that grew one step further.
Of course, rather than a lecture that emphasized only selfishness and selfishness,
a lecture that emphasized only selfishness and selfishness,
I was able to do a lecture that emphasized only selfishness and selfishness,
but that was also another process of realization for me.
I've been thinking a lot that life is a long learning process for humility,
and I hope that the amazing process of learning more and more things one by one
doesn't end too soon.
The reason I'm talking about that is that my body is getting old,
my head is getting white,
my body is getting dull,
and I don't know if I'm going to have a hard time with my body,
but in the process of aging,
even though my body is weak and I don't look strong and weak to others,
I thought that the shining spirit inside me was growing.
I think the real discussion about humanity comes from looking into my mind.
Where is my mind going?
What am I pursuing?
I was born in this world,
so what am I going to get and go to that world?
Since no one has ever died,
I think that discussing death is only possible in the books of philosophers.
However, I felt that I might die in a week
in the midst of a dilemma of death.
Even if I die and no longer exist in this world,
what do I really want to do when I'm alive?
What do I want to give to myself during the remaining period?
What kind of person do I want to be with?
What kind of content do I want to fill my remaining life with?
What do I prefer?
From deciding what I want to talk about with someone,
I thought that it was a process of learning about myself.
Everyone, these days,
you have to watch a video for 5 minutes to rest,
and you have to watch YouTube algorithms for 2 to 3 hours.
Have you ever experienced being trapped in a YouTube algorithm?
I have a request.
When was the last time you went to a bookstore?
These days, people are living in an era
where they open a book with one click on the internet
and it flies right away,
but when you hold your children's hands
or on a day when you are tired,
you can represent your mind for the rest of your life.
You can represent the person who is the most you.
How do you move around,
how do you transfer jobs,
and how do you retire?
When you were told to find three books that represent you,
you said,
it's not difficult to buy real estate.
Will you choose to be a high-ranking investor?
Will you choose to invest wisely?
The word humanity is a very broad term,
but the humanity I use is,
just like a slave to the algorithm,
I live by compromising with other people's eyes,
and I don't live by looking at the world's eyes
and thinking that I've lived well enough.
I think it starts with really looking for myself.
What I want,
what I want to fill myself with,
until I die,
these scenes are important to me,
so I fill myself with scenes that I can do.
It's embarrassing,
but YouTube is really fun, too.
I'm a YouTuber, too.
But I write a diary every year.
Let's not be slaves to the algorithm this year.
This year,
let's not be swayed too much by the videos
that the automatic algorithm recommends,
except for the keywords I searched because I was curious.
It's a difficult thing,
but when I see something fun
swaying around in the algorithm,
I sometimes think this.
Today,
my wasted time
has contributed to my life
in order to make it a more pure soul.
When I think about it,
there are many times when I feel sorry.
In that case,
I hold an analog notebook,
an analog fountain pen,
and write about why I live,
what I dream of,
and what I want to achieve.
I think this is the nature of human beings.
I think the main thing is to find what I want,
and from there,
the growth of the mind,
to the increasing growth of the personality,
and that kind of eel.
Then how can people
grow well?
I think it's a new step
that I think a person should take.
Although it has been aungen,
there have been some really takes
in writing a diary ten years later,
and still writing,
and asking a question
if I am getting along well
with my mind,
and thinking about
things I have been dreaming about
for 10 years in the future...
So,
I want to say that this is the beginning of humanity.
I always say this in my lectures.
We can't be slaves to algorithms from becoming our own masters.
That's what I really want to say.
Thank you for your hard work.
We will now end the press conference.
We look forward to hearing from you again.
Thank you.
Thank you for your hard work.